The defect is half a millimetre.
The board is three hundred.

AI inspection for electronics manufacturing — component presence, placement, solder condition and marking, at the resolution the defect actually requires.

Test it on your product

The Hard Case

Everything in electronics inspection is a resolution argument.

The governing constraint is simple and unforgiving: the defect you need to see sets the resolution, the resolution sets the field of view, and the field of view sets how many inspection points you need to cover the board.

Get that arithmetic wrong at specification time and no amount of model quality recovers it. A system that cannot resolve the defect will never detect it reliably, regardless of how it is trained.

The second difficulty is that solder is specular and boards are dense. A joint that looks acceptable from one angle looks suspect from another, and a rule written for one component package does not transfer to the next.

  • Resolution is settled before anything is trained.

    We work back from your smallest defect to the camera, lens and working distance, so the imaging is capable of the job before a model is built on top of it.

  • Several checks, one inspection point.

    Presence, placement, polarity and marking run simultaneously on the same board image rather than requiring separate passes.

What it checks

The checks an electronics line
actually needs.

  • Is everything populated?

    Component presence

    Presence and absence of components across the board, including small passives.

  • Is it in the right place?

    Placement & alignment

    Position, rotation and offset against the expected placement for that reference.

  • Is it the right way round?

    Polarity & orientation

    Polarity marking and orientation on diodes, electrolytics, ICs and connectors.

  • Does the joint look right?

    Solder condition

    Visual joint appearance — insufficient, excess, bridging and disturbed joints on visible solder.

  • Is this the right component?

    Marking & part ID

    Component marking read and checked against the expected part for that position.

  • Is the board itself sound?

    Board-level defects

    Damage, contamination, residue and handling marks on the bare or populated board.

  • Are the pins sound?

    Connector & pin

    Bent, missing or misaligned pins and connector seating before assembly.

  • Is it labelled and traceable?

    Label & serial

    Label presence, position and serial or data matrix reading for unit traceability.

  • Is the enclosure complete?

    Final assembly

    Component presence, cable routing, fastener presence and closure at box-build level.

Built for the environment

Fine features, reflective joints,
static-controlled areas.

Electronics is less mechanically hostile than metalworking but far less forgiving on imaging. These are the conditions the hardware is specified against.

ENVIRONMENT

Built for stability. Designed for real-world conditions.

  • ESD controlMounting and hardware appropriate to a static-controlled area
  • ResolutionCamera and lens selected from your smallest defect, not from a catalogue default
  • Working distanceOptics specified against available space above the conveyor or fixture
  • Cycle timeInspection specified to fit within the cell cycle, not extend it
  • CleanlinessSealed optics with a defined cleaning interval for flux and dust

IMAGING

Clearer vision. Smarter inspection.

  • Small featuresHigh-resolution industrial cameras matched to defect size
  • Specular solderMulti-angle and dome lighting for joint appearance
  • Height and coplanarity3D sensing where standoff and seating matter
  • Marking and codesOCR, OCV and code reading on marked parts
  • Large boardsMultiple inspection points where one field of view cannot cover the board
  • Low contrastLighting selected for dark components on dark substrate

On lighting. Solder is one of the most difficult surfaces in industrial vision: it is specular, curved and surrounded by components that cast shadows. Multi-angle and dome illumination is specified per board and validated on real assemblies, including the densest areas.

Where the record matters

Build records outlive the build.

Electronics defects frequently surface in the field rather than on the line, which makes what you retained at build time the only evidence available later.

  • Unit-level build record

    Every board or unit inspected is logged with its result and an image reference, so a field failure can be traced back to how that specific unit looked when it was built.

  • Consistent acceptance

    Acceptability criteria for electronics assemblies are widely standardised, but their application by eye varies between inspectors. A trained model applies the same interpretation to every board.

  • Trend visibility

    Placement drift, a failing nozzle or a degrading printhead shows as a trend across boards long before it shows as a failure on one.

The Platform

One Place to Train.
Two Place to Run

Shared by both

Model development

Quality

Line 1

Line 2

Line 3

Every line, plant and country

Safety

Production floor

existing cameras

Warehouse

existing cameras

Loading bay

existing cameras

Runtime and dashboard in one

Standards & codes

The standards your boards
are judged against.

The published criteria your customers, auditors and quality team already reference. We train models against your interpretation of these standards — we do not certify conformance to them, and an inspection result is not a conformity assessment.

  • IPC-A-610

    What it covers

    Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies. Visual acceptance criteria for soldered assemblies covering solder joints, component mounting, cleanliness and coating, applied at Class 1, 2 or 3 depending on the product.

    Where it applies

    Solder condition, component presence, placement and orientation

  • IPC J-STD-001

    What it covers

    Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic Assemblies. Materials, methods and process requirements for producing acceptable soldered connections, weighted towards process control rather than end-product inspection alone.

    Where it applies

    The process-side criteria behind the joints being inspected

  • ISO/IEC 15415

    What it covers

    Print quality for 2D codes. Graded A to F on symbol contrast, modulation, fixed pattern damage and grid non-uniformity, with the lowest parameter grade setting the overall grade.

    Where it applies

    Data matrix verification on boards and labels

  • ISO/IEC TR 29158

    What it covers

    Direct part mark quality, the DPM variant of 15415. Adds 30, 45 and 90 degree and dome lighting for curved, reflective and dot-peened surfaces.

    Where it applies

    Marked components, boards and enclosures

Automotive questions

What electronics teams ask first.

  • That is settled before anything else. We work back from your smallest defect to the required resolution, then to the camera, lens and working distance, and confirm the imaging is capable during the feasibility assessment — before a model is built on top of it.

Still deciding

The one question this page can't answer:
does it work on your defect?

  • Start here

    Send us your images

    Share examples of the defect you care about. We train a model on your product and come back with a straight answer — including if it's no.

    Start a feasibility check
  • Or ask directly

    Talk to an engineer

    Thirty minutes with someone who builds this. Bring your line speed, your defects and your integration constraints.